Best Price External Hard Drive

Words sewer

Those are dirty words, these phrases filthy, filthy remarks, heard here and there for years, inadvertently sown by false media awards declaimed as a world inevitable by a few repositories of political authority or economic purposes pitifully shameful to distill the poison flow depths that take the place of ideals, project, program.
An exhaustive list would be long to do. So it may be sufficient to its option to pick a few and put them together to sew the pieces and find the plan taking shape when, in the case or it would still be a discovery, or appear to have confirmed seeing the outlines of an appalling and barbaric speech consistent assertions these words despite denials dispersed after them by their creator and their henchmen in search of a contradiction with fig leaf to cover their shamelessness instincts too compromising.
It is not exactly issue a demonstration. It comes by itself. Awaken the sense of listening sometimes fragmented which prevents us to relate, as they are yet in their wake threatening, these words all of the outputs breviary insane voices that are transmitted by oral gravediggers of the human whose brood swarms everywhere today and who take pleasure at any particular sober and counting and everything under the chopping blade fixing their balance sheets. Starting
course by humans.

"Society does not exist! "Uttered the well-shabby boursico shopkeeper who did so calamitous Office ruling British government from May 1979 to November 1990. Taking his dreams a reality in fact she proclaimed her dearest wish: that the company did not exist. No longer existed. That everything that makes the social body in the country is reduced as much as possible to a set as possible individualities undefined, reduced, in turn, only to be more, each, than competing all others. And the best man win. Best to do all the characters that make the dominant Almighty on this subject so dominated the first time, and even submitted a second time to compete among themselves.
Later, later, an officer of a large factory programs debilitating nature television retailer, a magazine whose profile had to guarantee confidentiality about the discretion of nauseating, the sole object of his action: broadcast programs whose content is mentally uplifting least possible that there are flattered that there are more primary, more basic, more rough, so that consumers of these programs are in position to absorb like sponges docile other content of this richly rewarding TV channel: the multiple and long beaches advertisements. Formulated with the very words used by the direct This officer spoke in substance as well: "My job is to sell available brain time to Coca-Cola. In a terminology more common formats own language, if we dare say, this breed of greedy bosses outright, it could have been a less explicit form but not a mechanical closer to those that are user manuals for recurring exercises profitability boundless: "The profitability ratio of an advertisement is proportional to the reduction of sensory transducers. The efficiency of these sensors must be kept closer to the level where are the instincts. Any form of development intelligence relied on free will and critical thinking should be avoided and even forbidden. "
A little further, a little later, it was the turn of the leader of a powerful employers' organization, at the inauguration of its first term in office, seem to leave one of the foundations of its political approach and economic: "Life is fragile, love is precarious, why not work would it not? Madame defender of the interests of an entrepreneurial class among the most archaic and most backward in the world forum expressed concerns of shareholders, contributors club neo-feudal she had to take the lead. As many tusks obstinate and obtuse, never accept nor in form or in their substantive laws in our republic, our democracy, allowed employees to classes to improve their situation in a haphazard economic development, to acquire rights against the forces possessing little incentive to share, to evolve, taking on progressively from the pomp and dreadful tragedies in the history of the Twentieth Century, the path of an existing structure, reconstruction of a reconstruction of what produces what is called generically cohesion of a society.
Love is precarious? And what is mixed does one lady?
Life is precarious? What does this mean? Yes, that's right: the life of the little rodent that hops around in the meadow while a hawk on his background, his life is precarious. The delicate dragonfly flutters to the surface of the pond frog thank you for an appetite, his life is precarious. The gazelle is going to drink at the edge of a pond while the big crocodile walks between two waters, life is precarious. But all this has a name. A name that, whatever its geographical relevance, means all of such behavior: it's called the law of the jungle. And the law of the jungle is a strictly opposed to that which should guide in the ideas and manners, that any civilization that decides to move away from the time of the caves.
Still further, which brings us of course times when we are the primary resident of the palace where sits the summit of power in our country offered an extension to the above quotes. While we have noted that in his case is a slip, which will tell some of his detractors amazed that he had not meant what he had said. With the potential for conviction of these people, it is therefore only a ridiculous flirtation with intent wry smile. "The human being is not a commodity like others. "Said the provisional potentate.
is when I entered the "active life, (ie there are more than thirty years now), assuming that the life of a child or adolescent is a passive life, that began to be promoted in the same panels, indicators of their premises, the semantic shift that changed a few years in business the "Service staff "to" Human Resources ". Followed by dragging a modernist whose pidgin vocabulary endless pollution from fouling the political thought and action economist at which it was submitted, this index at the time could first appear with the artifice Searched . Make that the word is human superposât at first sight the word "resources". So forget that in the former designation "personal" contained in itself the presence of people.
Resource: as a subject. As commodity. As amount of gross proceeds to be agreed to reluctant to dominate the plasticity to be able to use as easy as any other.

It is fashionable to assert that national policies or international, or almost all subject to rules that economists no promoter has never been directly confronted with the practice of suffrage as it exists in a democracy, these policies, therefore, do not proceed from any ideology, no established body of thought as was the case, for example, Marxism, its aftermath and its avatars.
Wrong. Certainly there would be no such thing as "bible" containing all the project economics called liberal or neo-liberal or ultra-liberal, according to the chapels.
But there is a draft. It may seem authoritarian and for the less biased to collect the contents in a few quotes. But over the troubled waters of political discourse electorally committed to demonstrate programmatically singularities but chained to a total tyrannical imperium, to reveal the watermark soujacent, also aimed at décomplexion, however, seems even flow from this source words that escape the clergy government to serve this project in exchange for thrones and glories coarse. This project may still be available for the benefit of a certain democratic spirit, soon to be residual and ever adulterated inaccuracies on which the ruling Peoples could have taken but which media vehicles ensure the daily slow heavy, confident and development.

"The human being is a commodity like no other, but a commodity nonetheless. To use it with all the possible gifts should be in shape, to model the propensity to respond with the same facilities as any other commodity. To reach this state the human being should be deprived of up to everything that makes so little that it is his personality, his person: the thinking, emotions, Judgement, memory, culture. The objective to be pursued to obtain the desired semi-finished product is the reduction of the individual to even less than himself, the way of subtracting any recourse to a mode of socialization or association who can help to generate or regenerate some element of solidarity whatsoever. "
Nb: This last quote is not Alain Minc.

Draw And Describe A Car

The Sources of geek culture

I spoke a few days ago : the geek has since become few years, a figure of strength and legitimacy uncommon. So much so that a film like Kick-Ass was supported by a surprising reversal: replace the super-hero by the geek. Other examples could be cited, it is certain that geek culture has been widely disseminated. Becker is rereading I found a clue to understand where it comes from.

Who does not say geek today? The owner of an iPhone any claims to be such. Provided that play World of Warcraft, it might as well run as "ultra-geek". And even the girls, long excluded more or less voluntarily in this universe (apparently they still are, as evidenced by the picture below, found here), there are being supported by women's magazines too happy to fill pages and pages around the neologism "geek "and articles on" how to flirt with an iPhone. " Myself in that yard there, I can say geek. After all, I read Pratchett at a time when some neo-geeks gets off on the Mini-Keum.

True geeks, those who made the computer a way of life and who read The Lord of the Ring in VO before Peter Jackson did not make it trendy riled up. Even if only because the subtle differences between geeks, nerds and dorks (myself, I never understood anything) are routinely forgotten. Because they were a real deviant culture, and are now being absorbed by those they have always opposed. See noobs back - badly - its markings, it is understandable that it has something irritating. Especially when Apple tries to establish itself as the top of the geekitude, while the real pros swear by the PC that you can work yourself.

But where does this geek culture? Where she takes her roots? I would like to move a hypothesis from this classic of sociology what Outsiders . In Chapter 5, Howard Becker is studying "the culture of a deviant group", namely "dance musicians" 50-60 years in the United States. Based on field experience - he himself was a jazz musician - he clearly identifies a particular culture, actually not that different in its operation, our culture geek to us. In particular, these musicians are making a clear difference between them and the "squares" (a term translated in the French edition by "caves"), namely those who are not musicians. How not see a parallel with how the geeks monitor carefully the boundaries of their group?

But what is there is a unity of this culture? Why did it develop? Because the musicians dance all face common problems, and in returning to interaction between them, thus develop shared meanings. These problems have to do with the nature of their profession:

musicians dance [...] can be simply defined as people who play popular music to earn money. They perform a service business and the characteristics of culture they attend to common problems arising from these trades. These are distinguished in their entirety by the fact that their members maintain contact more or less direct and personal with the consumer's final product of their work, which they provide customer service. Consequently the customer is able to direct the worker in performing his task, and apply a range of different sanctions, ranging from informal pressure to abandon its services.

service professions are related in one hand a person whose business is focused full time on this job and whose personality is more or less deeply involved in it, on the other hand, people whose relationship to the job is much more casual. Sometimes it is inevitable that each party is represented very differently to how the service should be done. Members of service professions generally agree that the client is unable to truly evaluate the service they produce and they are extremely irritated by attempts clients to control their work. The result is a latent hostility and conflict, methods of defense against outside interference becomes a concern of the profession, and a sub-culture develops this whole problem. (Pp. 105-106)

These problems are not they also faced equally those who choose to make computer hacking and complicated machinery of their daily job? This passage reminded me immediately this post on The Oatmeal : entitled "How does a web designer goes straight into business," he recounts in great detail a similar conflict that musicians dance, between a web designer which has a clear idea of what a job well done, and a client who has obviously a different idea because, of course, the clown does not know anything about computers. One could almost re-write the following dialogue between two musicians to replace "band" with "software" and "cellar" with "noobs" (or any equivalent term), and put into the mouth of a geek, everyone would believe :

Dick: "It was the same when I worked at Club M. All the guys with whom I came to college and loved the band ... It was one of the worst bands with whom I ' I worked and they all thought it was excellent. "
Joe: "Oh, sure! Is a bunch of wineries." (P. 114)

can also refer to this post another computer expert, Kek blogger who makes websites through his company Zanorg: he recounts his difficulties when asked to work in an agency, then he prefers to work from home. Again, there is an independent IT professional against stupidity and severity of clients unable to properly serve a simple copy and paste, or worse, so disabled that they are reduced to using Apple rather than the real PC for true geeks who want to tweak lots of things in all directions.

My hypothesis is that the geek culture finds its roots here. Originally, computing was an activity of enthusiasts, often gathered on American campuses, which were able to define their own criteria for evaluation of what a good program because they were interacting with each other. With the spread of computers, they have faced in business and elsewhere, to people who claims to send to other computers, and different assessment criteria. They come into conflict with those of computer scientists that define a significant part of their identity around computer-generated graphics. This requires that they manage this conflict, and geek culture gives them that opportunity by designing a space independence for them. The specialized knowledge in areas that some would regard as trivial, eg science fiction, Star Trek or another, are means to express their exceptionality in relation to all-comers, however, which imposes specific ways of working. In the same way that jazz musicians told, admiring how to Becker one of them had set fire to a car just for fun ...

The comparison between a group of artists, musicians, dance and computer workers should not be surprising. The independence of the artist, his creative abilities, his strong personality, his talent inserted in projects where it brings something new, brief all the classical representation and a bit exaggerated in its business are in the heart of the operating principles of contemporary capitalism: we know from Boltanski and Chiapello, and I I talked at length about it a while ago . Therefore, it is not surprising that geek culture is spreading: it is deeply consistent with the "new spirit of capitalism." Hackers of all stripes do make may not always realize how they are ultimately conformist.

The parallel with jazz musicians can be pushed a little further. Their salvation, "see you later, alligator "eventually spread far beyond their borders, as the term" square ", which has come to mean any person or boring" old fashioned "(although the term" cheesy "or itself become old-fashioned). This also happens to geeks. In deviant subculture, regarded with suspicion by most conformist members of society but the eccentricities tolerated because of the services they render (play music making computer programs), they gradually join the ranks of the dominant culture. It was this qu'acheva to rock in the field of music. Perhaps what awaits geeks. Not sure whether they like it.

Ceramic Kitchen Wares

Resolutions sociological

Now is the time for resolutions. Mostly, they are quickly forgotten, this is normal in the absence of support, the individual will is weak. So much to take collective resolutions. Hey, why sociologists do not they collectively take a few good resolutions?

Resolution No. 1: do no quotes no quotes. Because it takes a lot of problems anyway. Hein, Ali? Although apparently not that much, and should perhaps be taken as a resolution not to over expose those who do, because it also causes problems. Hein, Peter?

Pierre Dubois was right to attack those who violate the most elementary rules of intellectual honesty and claimed, in addition, a blank check to do so. I can recall this quote from an economist, a Jevons: "A despotic calm is the triumph of the error. In the republic of the sciences, sedition and even anarchy are favorable in the long term than greatest happiness for the greatest number. "

Resolution No. 2: Flowing directly from the Resolution No. 1: social scientists should use 2011 to settle once and for all the problem with some current. Because this is what emerges most clearly from the discussion Dubar - Cibois. "Obviously we disagree on this point with the current maffesolien and its allies, but I have not noticed there is a conflict between other current" it wrote. There are disagreements and struggles in different currents and different approaches - for example it is ensured that Bourdieu and Latour can not feel - but at least everyone can sit around a table to match a minimum of sociology as an empirical science, a science investigation. This agreement can be made with the post-modernists. So it might be good to eat it.

Resolution No. 3: Think carefully before released a provocative thesis in the media. That's what we should teach the book's publication Hugues Lagrange Denial cultures. There could not have healthy discussion of this book, even among sociologists, because the question of media coverage has come to overlap with all others. Lagrange could repel critics by accusing them of refusing on principle results, and critics were forced to compromise between the book itself, and media reception of it. Result: an intractable debate. This does not mean that we must refrain from any intervention in the media, but it is probably necessary to think about how we do it.

Resolution No. 4: Complete the join the ranks of geeks encouraging the use of software from the command line gives you the impression of being reincarnated Alan Turing, persecution and less. Kind of R or LaTeX or others that probably exist and I do not know. Why? Because the geek has become one of the most popular and most positive of all. So why not enjoy it.

Resolution No. 5: more interested in what goes on in high school. Because reform is not over, because the program SES Terminal will be published in February, because he will have to pay attention to what is there - we were promised that such social class removed first to reappear. And because the question "Is that what I do would make sense for a college student?" is a good question to ask whether it makes interesting sociology. Certainly not the only one: in general, ask if you are doing would make sense for someone who is not a sociologist is probably a good thing.

I book all those resolutions for debate and discussion of who will. And Happy New Year to all.